Next Tools
Worth It?
Figure out if your innovation opportunity is “Worth It?”
Use it now for free.
Your Strategic Partner in Idea Validation
Assess the true potential of your ideas
Worth it? is a powerful software innovation tool designed for evaluating the comprehensive worth of proposed Innovation Opportunities. Tailored to assess investments across various dimensions such as economic, personal, and reputational, this tool prioritizes forms of capital crucial to the success of your innovation. With a structured approach, "Worth it?" helps you identify and rank assumptions, providing a clear understanding of the multifaceted worth of your project.
Capital Prioritization Mastery
Uncover the secrets of prioritizing different forms of capital vital to your innovation opportunity with "Worth it?"


Assumption Explorer
Dive deep into assumptions and discover their impact on the worthiness of your innovation through the innovative "Is It Worth It" drill.
Multidimensional Worth Unveiled
Gain a comprehensive understanding of worth across Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputational, and Social capital with "Worth it?"


Strategic Validation Blueprint
Unlock a strategic roadmap to validate assumptions, prioritizing quick wins and long-term validations for your innovation success.
Your Strategic Partner in Idea Validation
Assess the true potential of your ideas
Enumerate the capital forms most relevant to this innovation opportunity: Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputational, and Social.
Step 2: Gather Assumptions
For each form of capital, list assumptions indicating the innovation opportunity is worth it.
Step 3: Define Worthiness Criteria
Establish criteria for what makes the innovation opportunity "worth it" regarding each form of capital.
Step 4: Evaluate Assumptions
Assess each assumption based on its potential impact and relevance to the specific form of capital.
Step 5: Prioritize & Strategize
Prioritize assumptions for validation. Identify quick wins and long-term validations that need to be conducted.
Tips: Be as specific as possible when defining assumptions.
Use objective data wherever available for better evaluation.
Involve multiple perspectives for a comprehensive view.
Drills included in this Next Tool
-
Worthy or Not
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Worthy or Not Drill is designed to help innovators identify and prioritize the forms of capital that should be the strategic focus of an innovation opportunity. By ranking and weighting these forms of capital, organizations can align their innovation initiatives more closely with their broader strategic objectives, ensuring that resources are allocated where they can create the most impact. When to Use This Drill • When introducing a new innovation opportunity to assess its alignment with the organization's capital priorities. • At the outset of a strategic planning or budgeting session to guide resource allocation. • Periodically during the innovation lifecycle to reassess capital priorities and adjust the focus as needed. Recommended For • Strategic Alignment: Ensuring that innovation opportunities are focused on building the most critical forms of capital. • Resource Allocation: Guiding decision-makers on where to allocate resources to maximize impact. • Innovation Teams: Helping teams prioritize their efforts based on the organization's capital-building priorities. Drill Objectives • To identify the relevant forms of capital for a particular innovation opportunity. • To rank and weight these forms of capital based on their strategic significance to the organization. Useful Inputs • Results from prior strategic drills, such as the Goalbuilder or Vision Purpose Values GPTs. • Insights from stakeholders or leadership on current strategic priorities. • Existing assessments of capital forms and their importance to the organization.
-
Capital Converter
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Capital Converter Drill helps organizations conceptualize and define a currency for each form of capital, enabling the comparison, allocation, and prioritization of resources in alignment with strategic objectives. By attaching tangible currencies and denominations to different forms of capital, you can make informed decisions that align with the serious capital-building priorities of creating, protecting, and liberating various forms of capital. When to Use This Drill • After completing the "Worthy or Not Drill" to build upon the prioritized capitals. • Prior to major strategic planning sessions where resources will be allocated. • When reassessing the organization's strategic direction and priorities. • During Step 2 of the Reverse Income Statement Drill to quantify investments in different forms of capital. Recommended For • Strategic Capital Allocation: Aligning resources with the organization's serious capital-building priorities. • Holistic Decision-Making: Ensuring that all forms of capital are considered and quantified. • Cross-Capital Comparisons: Facilitating the comparison of different forms of capital to guide resource allocation. Drill Objectives • To define a specific currency for each form of capital. • To establish clear denominations that provide tangible measures for each capital currency. • To determine exchange rates that reflect the relative values and priorities of different capital forms. Useful Inputs • Outputs from the ”Worthy or Not Drill” to understand which forms of capital are prioritized. • Strategic goals and priorities of the organization. • Insights from constituents on the relative importance of different forms of capital.
-
Risky Business
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Risky Business Drill evaluates the potential risks an innovation opportunity presents to various forms of capital. It provides a structured approach to identify, assess, and score risks, helping organizations understand and prepare for potential challenges associated with innovation efforts. When to Use This Drill • During strategic planning or resource allocation sessions. • When assessing potential risks of an innovation opportunity, especially during the early stages of the Next Cycle. • Periodically throughout the Next Cycle to recalibrate risk assessments based on evolving insights and contexts. • Prior to Super Seven Reviews throughout the Next Cycle. Recommended For This drill is particularly useful for the following Jobs to Be Done (JTBD): • Mitigating Risks: Leaders aiming to identify and mitigate risks associated with innovation opportunities. • Strategic Decision-Making: Teams needing to make informed decisions about which innovation opportunities to pursue or pause based on risk assessments. • Resource Allocation: Managers responsible for allocating resources to innovation projects, ensuring that risks are accounted for in budgeting and planning. • Portfolio Management: Next Board members managing a portfolio of innovation opportunities and needing to understand the risk landscape of each opportunity. • Innovation Readiness: Teams looking to assess and enhance the organization's readiness to manage and mitigate risks in their innovation processes. Drill Objectives • To systematically identify risks associated with the innovation opportunity. • To quantify and score these risks based on their potential impact and the probability of occurrence. • To derive a Capital Risk Score that captures the aggregate risk associated with the opportunity. Useful Inputs • Previous assessments of the innovation opportunity. • Insights from stakeholders, team members, and industry experts. • Data from similar projects or historical risk assessments.
-
Promises Promises
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Promises, Promises Drill systematically evaluates the potential contributions that an innovation opportunity might bring to various forms of capital. This includes both protective measures to safeguard existing capital and the generation of new capital. By identifying and assessing these contributions, organizations can better understand the potential benefits and value addition of their innovation efforts. When to Use This Drill • During strategic planning or resource allocation sessions to ensure alignment with capital-centric goals. • When weighing the advantages of different innovation opportunities. • At the outset of an innovation opportunity, to understand its alignment with capital augmentation and protection. • Before Super Seven Reviews in the Next Cycle. • Periodically throughout the Next Cycle to recalibrate contribution estimates based on evolving insights and contexts. Recommended For • Capital Augmentation: Leaders aiming to maximize the potential contributions of innovation opportunities to various forms of capital. • Strategic Decision-Making: Teams needing to prioritize innovation opportunities based on their potential value addition. • Resource Allocation: Managers responsible for allocating resources to opportunities that offer the greatest capital contributions. • Portfolio Management: Next Board members evaluating the overall value that a portfolio of innovation opportunities can generate. • Innovation Readiness: Teams assessing the alignment of innovation opportunities with strategic capital-building goals. Drill Objectives • To systematically identify potential contributions the innovation opportunity might make to various forms of capital. • To quantify and evaluate these contributions based on their magnitude and significance. • To derive insights that encapsulate the potential benefits and value addition across all forms of capital. Useful Inputs • Previous assessments of the innovation opportunity. • Insights from stakeholders, team members, and industry experts. • Data from similar projects or historical contribution assessments.
-
Mind the Gap
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Mind the Gap Drill explores the capital requirements associated with an innovation opportunity. It offers a structured approach to identify the capital needs, assess their significance to the opportunity’s success, and understand the complexity or cost of meeting them. The results provide an overview of potential gaps in the innovation’s capital structure, offering a roadmap to resource allocation and strategic decision-making. When to Use This Drill • In the early stages of an innovation opportunity to identify potential capital challenges. • When adjusting project scopes or seeking partnerships to fill capital needs. • Before resource allocation or fundraising activities. Recommended For • Resource Planning: Identifying and prioritizing the capital needs of an innovation opportunity to guide resource allocation. • Risk Mitigation: Understanding potential challenges and gaps in the capital structure that could impact the success of the innovation. • Strategic Alignment: Ensuring that the innovation opportunity’s capital needs align with broader organizational goals and capabilities. • Partnership Development: Identifying areas where external partnerships or collaborations may be necessary to meet capital requirements. Drill Objectives • Identify the various capital needs of the innovation opportunity. • Evaluate the importance of each need to the potential success of the opportunity. • Assess the complexity or cost associated with fulfilling each need. • Generate a comprehensive Capital Needs Score to inform decision-making. Useful Inputs • Initial assessments of the innovation opportunity. • Input from stakeholders and team members. • Historical data or benchmarks from similar innovation efforts.
-
Total Impact
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Total Impact Drill assesses an innovation opportunity’s potential impact on various forms of capital within an organization. It integrates insights from multiple previous drills to provide a comprehensive understanding of how an innovation opportunity will affect each form of capital. This drill helps innovators evaluate if innovation opportunities are "Worth It" by offering a unified Capital Impact Score that reflects the strategic alignment and potential value of the innovation opportunity. When to Use This Drill • Before Super Seven Reviews: Complete this drill prior to your Super Seven Reviews with the Next Boards to provide valuable insights into the state and potential of the innovation opportunity. It equips you with data-driven assessments that can facilitate more productive and targeted discussions. • After Small Bets: Recalculate your Capital Impact Scores after completing small bets that test super vital assumptions. This helps reassess and realign your focus and resources based on new findings and changes in the forms of capital. • Ongoing Decision-Making: Use this drill as an ongoing metric for decision-making as your innovation opportunity evolves. It’s especially useful when preparing to pivot, scale, or make other significant changes to the initiative. Recommended For • Strategic Alignment: Ensuring that innovation opportunities are aligned with the organization’s broader strategic goals and capital priorities. • Resource Allocation: Assisting in the prioritization of resources by evaluating the overall impact of an innovation opportunity. • Risk Management: Identifying and mitigating risks associated with the innovation opportunity by understanding its impact on various forms of capital. • Decision Making: Providing a clear, quantifiable metric (Capital Impact Score) to guide innovation-related decisions. Drill Objectives • To integrate various aspects of capital (risk, contribution, needs) into one unified score. • To assist in the evaluation of the worthiness of innovation opportunities. • To provide a holistic view of the innovation opportunity’s impact on the organization’s strategic goals and resources. Useful Inputs • Scores and insights from the Worthy or Not Drill, Risky Business Drill, Promises Promises Drill, and Mind the Gap Drill. • Strategic goals and priorities of the organization. • Input from key stakeholders and team members.
-
Plan B, C, D, and E
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Plan B, C, D, and E Drill helps innovation teams assess the flexibility, speed, scalability, and exit strategies for an innovation opportunity across multiple forms of capital—Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputational, and Social. This drill ensures the innovation opportunity can adapt to changing circumstances and provides a strategic view on its versatility. When to Use This Drill • After assessing whether an innovation is worth pursuing through tools like Worthy or Not, Capital Converter, or Risky Business. • During planning and budgeting phases to evaluate how resources can be flexibly allocated or adjusted. • When considering how to scale or pivot an innovation based on evolving market or organizational needs. Recommended For • Strategic Adaptability: Evaluating how quickly an innovation can scale, shift, or be exited based on organizational goals. • Risk Management: Ensuring that options to adjust, pause, or exit the innovation are clearly understood. • Capital Flexibility: Assessing how different forms of capital—human, financial, intellectual, political, reputational, and social—support the innovation opportunity. Drill Objectives • To evaluate the Flexibility, Speed, Scalability, and Exit strategies for each form of capital tied to an innovation opportunity. • To prioritize capital forms based on their potential to adapt and support the innovation under changing conditions.
-
Op-at-a-Glance
Move Fast
unrated (0)
The Op-at-a-Glance Drill offers a comprehensive snapshot of a single Innovation Opportunity. It amalgamates vital data points and calculations, facilitating informed decisions for Next Innovators, Next Managers, and the Next Board. This drill is crucial for understanding the financial and strategic elements of an opportunity, ensuring that it aligns with the organization's serious capital-building priorities—creating, protecting, and liberating human, intellectual, political, reputational, social, and financial capital. When to Use This Drill • Prior to Next Board Meetings. • Before and after significant Next Cycle Steps. • During Super Seven Reviews. • Throughout budgeting and funding allocation phases. Recommended For • Strategic Alignment: Ensuring the Innovation Opportunity aligns with serious capital-building priorities. • Resource Allocation: Making informed decisions about funding and resources based on a holistic understanding of the opportunity. • Risk Management: Evaluating the risks and potential contributions of the opportunity to various forms of capital. • Capital Impact Assessment: Assessing how the opportunity impacts human, intellectual, political, reputational, social, and financial capital. Drill Objectives • Collate essential information about the Innovation Opportunity. • Gain insights into the financial and strategic elements of the opportunity. • Chronicle Super Vital Assumptions (SVAs) and their current statuses. Useful Inputs • Outputs from the Port-at-a-Glance Drill. • Previous reviews of the Innovation Opportunity. • Present funding distributions and financial metrics. • Details and roles of the Next Team.
Data-Driven Decision
Excellence
Elevate your decision-making process by incorporating objective data for evaluating assumptions, ensuring a robust foundation for your innovation journey.
Use Worth It?
Why use “Worth It?”
In a dynamic landscape, "Worth it?" stands as your indispensable ally, offering a structured approach to assess the true worth of innovation opportunities. By aligning with diverse forms of capital—Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputation, and Social—this tool equips you with a comprehensive understanding of what makes an opportunity worth pursuing.
Be it quick wins or long-term validations, this tool ensures that your innovation endeavors are not just ambitious but also backed by a solid foundation, making every pursuit undeniably "Worth it."
Easy to use: Follow simple steps to clear up uncertainties and plan the best actions for success.
Are you interested?
We will notify you as soon as it is available, leave us your email here.
We need validate if you can continue
If you would like to use the next tool, please enter your email below.
Worthy or Not
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
15 mins
Modality
Team
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- When introducing a new innovation opportunity to assess its alignment with the organization's capital priorities.
- At the outset of a strategic planning or budgeting session to guide resource allocation.
- Periodically during the innovation lifecycle to reassess capital priorities and adjust the focus as needed.
Recommended For
- Strategic Alignment: Ensuring that innovation opportunities are focused on building the most critical forms of capital.
- Resource Allocation: Guiding decision-makers on where to allocate resources to maximize impact.
- Innovation Teams: Helping teams prioritize their efforts based on the organization's capital-building priorities.
Drill Objectives
- To identify the relevant forms of capital for a particular innovation opportunity.
- To rank and weight these forms of capital based on their strategic significance to the organization.
Useful Inputs
- Results from prior strategic drills, such as the Goalbuilder or Vision Purpose Values GPTs.
- Insights from stakeholders or leadership on current strategic priorities.
- Existing assessments of capital forms and their importance to the organization.
Outcomes
- A clear hierarchy of capital forms, indicating which are most crucial for the innovation opportunity.
- A set of weights for each form of capital, providing a quantifiable measure of its importance to the organization.
- Documented alignment of the innovation opportunity with broader strategic goals.
Using the results from previous strategic drills, list the forms of capital that scored above zero. These forms of capital could include Financial, Human, Intellectual, Political, Reputational, and Social Capital.
Step 2. Rank Capitals.
Order the forms of capital based on their perceived importance to the innovation opportunity, from 1 (most important) to 6 (least important). This ranking should reflect how critical each form of capital is to achieving the innovation's objectives.
Step 3. Assign Weights to Capitals.
Allocate a weighting to each form of capital. This weight represents the relative importance of that capital form to the organization in the context of the innovation. The total of all weights should equal 100%.
Example: If Financial Capital is considered twice as important as Human Capital, it might be given a weight of 40%, while Human Capital gets 20%. The weighting can be determined based on strategic objectives, resource availability, or stakeholder input.
Step 4. Reflect on Rankings and Weights.
Assess if the ranked and weighted capitals align with the organization's broader strategic objectives. Ensure that the focus is on the most critical forms of capital for this innovation, considering both immediate and long-term impacts.
Step 5. Document and Share.
Record the rankings, weights, and any notes or justifications. Share these with stakeholders, the team, or any relevant parties for feedback and to ensure alignment. This documentation will serve as a reference point for decision-making throughout the innovation process.
Step 6. Revisit and Update.
As the innovation progresses and as organizational priorities shift, return to this drill to adjust rankings and weights as necessary. This step ensures that the innovation remains aligned with the evolving strategic needs of the organization.
- Context Matters: Weights should reflect the specific context of the innovation opportunity, considering factors like market conditions, organizational goals, and available resources.
- Constituent Involvement: Engaging key constituents in the ranking and weighting process can provide valuable insights and help secure buy-in for the final decisions.
- Regular Reviews: Regularly revisiting and updating the capital rankings and weights helps keep the innovation aligned with any changes in the organization’s strategic direction.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “Which forms of capital should be prioritized for this innovation opportunity?”
- “How should we weight the importance of each form of capital relative to our strategic goals?”
- “What are the potential impacts of focusing more on one form of capital over another?”
Example: Launching a Digital Health Platform
- Financial Capital: The organization needs to ensure that the platform generates sufficient revenue to sustain operations and provide a return on investment.
- Human Capital: The platform’s success depends on having a skilled team of healthcare professionals, data scientists, and technical support staff.
- Intellectual Capital: The platform will leverage proprietary AI algorithms and health data analytics, making intellectual property protection and innovation crucial.
- Social Capital: Building trust and relationships with patients and healthcare providers is essential for widespread adoption.
- Reputational Capital: The organization’s reputation for providing high-quality, reliable healthcare services will influence adoption rates.
- Political Capital: Navigating healthcare regulations and securing support from policymakers and industry influencers is necessary to ensure compliance and gain market entry.
Capital Rankings
- Social Capital
- Intellectual Capital
- Reputational Capital
- Financial Capital
- Human Capital
- Political Capital
Justification
- Social Capital is ranked highest because the platform’s adoption depends heavily on the relationships and trust built with patients and healthcare providers. Without strong social capital, the platform may struggle to gain traction, particularly in underserved areas where trust in digital health solutions may be low.
- Intellectual Capital is ranked second as the platform’s unique value proposition hinges on proprietary AI algorithms and health data analytics. Protecting and enhancing this intellectual property is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge.
- Reputational Capital is third because the organization’s reputation for providing reliable healthcare services will significantly influence user trust and adoption rates.
- Financial Capital is ranked fourth. While financial returns are important, the organization prioritizes long-term growth and impact over immediate financial gains.
- Human Capital is ranked fifth, reflecting the need for skilled professionals to support the platform’s operations and development. However, the organization believes that attracting talent will be easier once the platform’s social and intellectual capital are established.
- Political Capital is ranked lowest but is still essential. While navigating regulations is crucial, the organization feels confident in its ability to manage this aspect with existing resources.
Capital Weights
- Social Capital: 30%
- Intellectual Capital: 25%
- Reputational Capital: 20%
- Financial Capital: 15%
- Human Capital: 5%
- Political Capital: 5%
Rationale
- The Social Capital weight of 30% reflects the platform's reliance on building strong relationships with patients and providers to ensure adoption and success.
- Intellectual Capital is weighted at 25%, acknowledging the critical role of proprietary technology and innovation in differentiating the platform in the competitive digital health market.
- Reputational Capital is assigned a 20% weight, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a strong reputation for quality and reliability in healthcare services.
- Financial Capital is weighted at 15%, balancing the need for revenue generation with the organization’s focus on long-term impact.
- Human Capital and Political Capital are both weighted at 5%, reflecting their importance but recognizing that they are secondary to the platform’s social, intellectual, and reputational priorities at this stage of development.
Capital Converter
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
30 mins
Modality
Group
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- After completing the "Worthy or Not Drill" to build upon the prioritized capitals.
- Prior to major strategic planning sessions where resources will be allocated.
- When reassessing the organization's strategic direction and priorities.
- During Step 2 of the Reverse Income Statement Drill to quantify investments in different forms of capital.
Recommended For
- Strategic Capital Allocation: Aligning resources with the organization's serious capital-building priorities.
- Holistic Decision-Making: Ensuring that all forms of capital are considered and quantified.
- Cross-Capital Comparisons: Facilitating the comparison of different forms of capital to guide resource allocation.
Drill Objectives
- To define a specific currency for each form of capital.
- To establish clear denominations that provide tangible measures for each capital currency.
- To determine exchange rates that reflect the relative values and priorities of different capital forms.
Useful Inputs
- Outputs from the ”Worthy or Not Drill” to understand which forms of capital are prioritized.
- Strategic goals and priorities of the organization.
- Insights from constituents on the relative importance of different forms of capital.
Outcomes
- A well-defined currency for each capital type.
- Clear denominations that offer tangible measures for each capital currency.
- Exchange rates that allow for meaningful comparison and prioritization of different forms of capital.
Reiterate the definitions and priorities established in the "Worthy or Not Drill" for each form of capital. Ensure that all participants have a clear understanding of what each form of capital represents in your organization.
Step 2: Define the Capital Currency
Assign a specific currency to each form of capital based on its value and role within your organization. Consider how this currency will help quantify and communicate the value of the capital.
Examples
- Financial Capital: Dollars ($)
- Human Capital: Skills (Sk) or Experience Points (Xp)
- Intellectual Capital: Patents (Pt) or Innovation Points (Ip)
- Political Capital: Influence Points (Ip)
- Reputation Capital: Trust Units (Tu)
- Social Capital: Community Engagement Points (Cep)
Step 3: Define Denominations
Break down each capital currency into 'units' or 'sizes' that make it easier to quantify and measure.
Examples
- Financial Capital: $1, $10, $100, etc.
- Human Capital: 1 Skill, 5 Skills, 10 Skills
- Intellectual Capital: 1 Patent, 5 Patents, 10 Patents
- Political Capital: 1 Influence Point, 5 Influence Points
- Reputation Capital: 1 Trust Unit, 10 Trust Units
- Social Capital: 1 Engagement Point, 5 Engagement Points
Step 4: Establish Exchange Rates
Establish how each capital currency can be converted into another. Consider both the theoretical and practical implications of these exchange rates.
Example Exchange Rates:
To Capital: 1 Trust Unit (Rep)
Exchange Rate: 1:1
From Capital: 1 Patent (Intel)
To Capital: 1000 Dollars (Fin)
Exchange Rate: 1:1000
From Capital: 1 Influence Point (Pol)
To Capital: 5 Engagement Points (Soc)
Exchange Rate: 1:5
Consider scenarios in which these exchange rates would be applicable and realistic. Note that some direct exchanges may not always be feasible.
Collaborate with stakeholders to review the defined currencies, denominations, and exchange rates. Gather insights on the implications of these conversions and adjust as necessary to ensure they reflect organizational priorities.
Step 6: Document & Communicate
Clearly document the established currencies, denominations, and exchange rates. Ensure that this information is communicated across the organization so that all team members understand how to use these metrics in decision-making.
Step 7: Revisit Periodically
Periodically review and update the capital currencies and exchange rates to ensure they remain relevant as the organization and its priorities evolve.
- Align with Strategy: Ensure that the defined currencies and exchange rates align with the organization’s strategic goals and capital-building priorities.
- Consider Practicality: While it’s essential to conceptualize currencies for each form of capital, ensure they are practical and usable in real decision-making scenarios.
- Engage Stakeholders: Involve key stakeholders in the process to gain diverse perspectives and ensure buy-in for the final outputs.
- Iterate as Needed: Don’t hesitate to refine and iterate on the currencies and exchange rates as the organization grows and changes.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “What would be an appropriate currency for quantifying social capital in our organization?”
- “How can we determine the exchange rate between financial capital and intellectual capital?”
- “Suggest ways to break down the currency for human capital into measurable denominations.”
- “How should we adjust our capital exchange rates to reflect changes in strategic priorities?”
Example: Capital Conversion into Financial Capital
Financial Capital: Dollars ($)
Denominations: $1, $10, $100, $1000
Human Capital: Skills (Sk)
Conversion Rate: 1 Skill = $500
Example: 10 Skills = $5,000
Intellectual Capital: Patents (Pt)
Conversion Rate: 1 Patent = $10,000
Example: 3 Patents = $30,000
Political Capital: Influence Points (Ip)
Conversion Rate: 1 Influence Point = $2,000
Example: 5 Influence Points = $10,000
Reputation Capital: Trust Units (Tu)
Conversion Rate: 1 Trust Unit = $1,000
Example: 7 Trust Units = $7,000
Social Capital: Community Engagement Points (Cep)
Conversion Rate: 1 Engagement Point = $500
Example: 20 Engagement Points = $10,000
Human Capital:
The project requires 50 Skills.
Conversion to Dollars: 50 Skills × $500/Skill = $25,000
Intellectual Capital:
The project involves 4 Patents.
Conversion to Dollars: 4 Patents × $10,000/Patent = $40,000
Political Capital:
The project will need 10 Influence Points for regulatory approvals.
Conversion to Dollars: 10 Influence Points × $2,000/Influence Point = $20,000
Reputation Capital:
Building trust with key stakeholders will require 15 Trust Units.
Conversion to Dollars: 15 Trust Units × $1,000/Trust Unit = $15,000
Social Capital:
Engaging with the community will involve 25 Engagement Points.
Conversion to Dollars: 25 Engagement Points × $500/Engagement Point = $12,500
- Human Capital: $25,000
- Intellectual Capital: $40,000
- Political Capital: $20,000
- Reputation Capital: $15,000
-
Social Capital: $12,500
Risky Business
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
25 mins
Modality
Team
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- During strategic planning or resource allocation sessions.
- When assessing potential risks of an innovation opportunity, especially during the early stages of the Next Cycle.
- Periodically throughout the Next Cycle to recalibrate risk assessments based on evolving insights and contexts.
- Prior to Super Seven Reviews throughout the Next Cycle.
Recommended For
- Mitigating Risks: Leaders aiming to identify and mitigate risks associated with innovation opportunities.
- Strategic Decision-Making: Teams needing to make informed decisions about which innovation opportunities to pursue or pause based on risk assessments.
- Resource Allocation: Managers responsible for allocating resources to innovation projects, ensuring that risks are accounted for in budgeting and planning.
- Portfolio Management: Next Board members managing a portfolio of innovation opportunities and needing to understand the risk landscape of each opportunity.
- Innovation Readiness: Teams looking to assess and enhance the organization's readiness to manage and mitigate risks in their innovation processes.
Drill Objectives
- To systematically identify risks associated with the innovation opportunity.
- To quantify and score these risks based on their potential impact and the probability of occurrence.
- To derive a Capital Risk Score that captures the aggregate risk associated with the opportunity.
Useful Inputs
- Previous assessments of the innovation opportunity.
- Insights from stakeholders, team members, and industry experts.
- Data from similar projects or historical risk assessments.
Outcomes
- Detailed risk profiles for each form of capital related to the innovation opportunity.
- A single, quantified Capital Risk Score, offering a comprehensive view of the associated risks across all forms of capital.
- Enhanced awareness and understanding of potential challenges, enabling better-informed decisions and proactive risk mitigation.
Familiarize yourself with the six forms of capital: Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputation, and Social Capital.
List specific risks that the innovation might pose to each form of capital.
For each risk, provide a brief description of the potential negative consequence(s) should the risk materialize.
Assign a risk score between 1 and 5 for each listed risk, taking into consideration both the severity of the potential impact and the likelihood of its occurrence.
Sum the risk scores for each form of capital, then divide the total by the number of identified risks. This will provide an average Capital Risk Score for the specific capital.
Total all six Form of Capital Risk Scores and divide the total by six.
Record the Capital Risk Score and maintain a repository of the detailed risks, descriptions, and associated scores for each form of capital.
Engage with your team, Next Advocates, Next Board members, and other contributors to discuss your findings. This collaborative engagement can unearth additional risks or provide alternative perspectives on the assessed risks.
Given that risks can evolve as projects progress and external factors change, it’s crucial to periodically return to this drill and adjust risk assessments and scores as needed.
- Be Comprehensive: Include risks from both internal and external factors to get a full picture.
- Engage Stakeholders: Involve team members from different departments to ensure diverse perspectives on potential risks.
- Prioritize High-Impact Risks: While it's essential to assess all risks, focus on those with the highest impact and probability for more detailed analysis and mitigation strategies.
- Use Historical Data: If available, use past project data to inform your risk assessment, especially for similar innovation opportunities.
- Regularly Update: Revisit the drill at key stages of the Next Cycle to ensure that your risk assessments remain relevant.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “What are the potential risks to our organization's intellectual capital for this innovation opportunity?”
- “How should we score the impact of a potential loss of social capital?”
- “Can you help quantify the risk of financial capital loss for this innovation?”
- “What are the most critical risks we should focus on in this innovation project?”
Example: A company is launching a new AI-driven customer service platform.
- Human Capital Risk: Difficulty in hiring skilled AI engineers due to high demand. Score: 4
- Financial Capital Risk: High initial investment with uncertain ROI. Score: 3
- Intellectual Capital Risk: Risk of competitors replicating proprietary algorithms. Score: 4
- Political Capital Risk: Potential regulatory hurdles in different regions. Score: 3
- Reputational Capital Risk: Negative public perception if the AI fails in customer interactions. Score: 4
- Social Capital Risk: Resistance from existing employees fearing AI will replace their jobs. Score: 3
Form of Capital Risk Scores
- Human Capital Risk Score: 4
- Financial Capital Risk Score: 3
- Intellectual Capital Risk Score: 4
- Political Capital Risk Score: 3
- Reputational Capital Risk Score: 4
- Social Capital Risk Score: 3
Promises Promises
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
30 mins
Modality
Team
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- During strategic planning or resource allocation sessions to ensure alignment with capital-centric goals.
- When weighing the advantages of different innovation opportunities.
- At the outset of an innovation opportunity, to understand its alignment with capital augmentation and protection.
- Before Super Seven Reviews in the Next Cycle.
- Periodically throughout the Next Cycle to recalibrate contribution estimates based on evolving insights and contexts.
Recommended For
- Capital Augmentation: Leaders aiming to maximize the potential contributions of innovation opportunities to various forms of capital.
- Strategic Decision-Making: Teams needing to prioritize innovation opportunities based on their potential value addition.
- Resource Allocation: Managers responsible for allocating resources to opportunities that offer the greatest capital contributions.
- Portfolio Management: Next Board members evaluating the overall value that a portfolio of innovation opportunities can generate.
- Innovation Readiness: Teams assessing the alignment of innovation opportunities with strategic capital-building goals.
Drill Objectives
- To systematically identify potential contributions the innovation opportunity might make to various forms of capital.
- To quantify and evaluate these contributions based on their magnitude and significance.
- To derive insights that encapsulate the potential benefits and value addition across all forms of capital.
Useful Inputs
- Previous assessments of the innovation opportunity.
- Insights from stakeholders, team members, and industry experts.
- Data from similar projects or historical contribution assessments.
Outcomes
- Detailed contribution profiles for each form of capital associated with the innovation opportunity.
- Enhanced understanding of the potential value of the innovation opportunity.
- Informed decisions and strategic alignments, bolstered by clear insights into capital contributions.
Revisit the definitions and characteristics of the six forms of capital: Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputation, and Social Capital.
List specific ways the innovation might contribute to the particular form of capital. Consider both protective aspects (shielding from loss or harm) and generative aspects (creating new capital or enhancing existing capital).
For each identified contribution, provide a brief description of its potential positive impact.
Assign a contribution score between 1 and 5 for each listed contribution, considering the magnitude and significance of the potential impact.
Sum the contribution scores for all listed items for that form of capital, then divide by the number of identified contributions. This will provide an average Capital Contribution Score for the specific capital.
Total all six Form of Capital Contribution Scores and divide the total by six.
Analyze the scores for each form of capital. Identify which areas of capital the innovation contributes to the most and least. This will provide insights into the holistic value of the innovation.
Record the average contribution scores for each form of capital and maintain a repository of the detailed contributions, descriptions, and associated scores.
Engage with your team, Next Advocates, Next Board members, and other contributors to discuss your findings. Such engagements can provide additional insights or alternative perspectives on the assessed contributions.
Given that the potential contributions of innovations can evolve as projects progress and external factors change, it's essential to periodically return to this drill and adjust contribution assessments and scores as necessary.
- Be Comprehensive: Include contributions that enhance existing capital as well as those that protect against potential losses.
- Engage Stakeholders: Involve team members from different departments to ensure diverse perspectives on potential contributions.
- Prioritize High-Impact Contributions: Focus on contributions that offer the most significant value to the organization’s strategic goals.
- Use Historical Data: If available, use past project data to inform your contribution assessment, especially for similar innovation opportunities.
- Regularly Update: Revisit the drill at key stages of the Next Cycle to ensure that your contribution assessments remain relevant.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “What potential contributions might this innovation make to our organization's intellectual capital?”
- “How can we quantify the value of reputational capital contributions for this opportunity?”
- “What are the most significant contributions this innovation could make to our social capital?”
- “How should we score the potential impact of this innovation on our political capital?”
Example: A company is developing a new sustainable packaging solution.
- Human Capital Contribution: Improved employee morale due to alignment with sustainability goals. Score: 4
- Financial Capital Contribution: Cost savings through reduced material usage. Score: 3
- Intellectual Capital Contribution: New patents for innovative packaging materials. Score: 5
- Political Capital Contribution: Enhanced relationships with regulatory bodies through compliance with environmental standards. Score: 4
- Reputation Capital Contribution: Strengthened brand reputation as a leader in sustainability. Score: 5
- Social Capital Contribution: Increased community engagement through environmental initiatives. Score: 4
Capital Contribution Scores:
- Human Capital Contribution Score: 4
- Financial Capital Contribution Score: 3
- Intellectual Capital Contribution Score: 5
- Political Capital Contribution Score: 4
- Reputation Capital Contribution Score: 5
- Social Capital Contribution Score: 4
Mind the Gap
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
25 mins
Modality
Team
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- In the early stages of an innovation opportunity to identify potential capital challenges.
- When adjusting project scopes or seeking partnerships to fill capital needs.
- Before resource allocation or fundraising activities.
Recommended For
- Resource Planning: Identifying and prioritizing the capital needs of an innovation opportunity to guide resource allocation.
- Risk Mitigation: Understanding potential challenges and gaps in the capital structure that could impact the success of the innovation.
- Strategic Alignment: Ensuring that the innovation opportunity’s capital needs align with broader organizational goals and capabilities.
- Partnership Development: Identifying areas where external partnerships or collaborations may be necessary to meet capital requirements.
Drill Objectives
- Identify the various capital needs of the innovation opportunity.
- Evaluate the importance of each need to the potential success of the opportunity.
- Assess the complexity or cost associated with fulfilling each need.
- Generate a comprehensive Capital Needs Score to inform decision-making.
Useful Inputs
- Initial assessments of the innovation opportunity.
- Input from stakeholders and team members.
- Historical data or benchmarks from similar innovation efforts.
Outcomes
- A clear understanding of the capital requirements and challenges for the innovation opportunity.
- Prioritized list of capital needs based on their importance and complexity/cost.
- An Overall Capital Needs Score for the innovation opportunity, guiding strategic decisions and resource allocation.
For each of the six forms of capital (financial, manufactured, intellectual, human, natural, and social), list the specific needs associated with the innovation opportunity.
For each listed need, assign an importance score between 1 and 5,
For each need, assign a ComplexityCost score between 1 and 5.
Add the Importance and Complexity Cost scores for the form of capital.
Divide the total of those scores by the number of Importance and Complexity scores.
To get an overarching perspective on the innovation opportunity's capital requirements, average the Capital Needs Scores from all six forms of capital. This will give you the Overall Capital Needs Score for the innovation opportunity.
Score 1 (Minimal):
- Importance: Least important; not crucial.
- Complexity/Cost: Easy and inexpensive to meet.
- Importance: Minor impact; not a primary driver.
- Complexity/Cost: Relatively easy and cost-effective.
- Importance: Significant role but not dominant.
- Complexity/Cost: Requires moderate effort and resources.
- Importance: Highly important; a key driver of success.
- Complexity/Cost: Challenging requires substantial resources.
- Importance: Critical and indispensable.
- Complexity/Cost: Highly complex or costly, demands significant resources.
Capture the scores and the underlying reasoning. Reflect on areas that might need additional attention or resources.
Engage your team, the Next Board, the Next Advocates, and other contributors by sharing your findings. Collect feedback and ensure a shared understanding of the capital needs and potential challenges.
- Consider All Capital Forms: Ensure that you comprehensively evaluate the needs across all six forms of capital to avoid overlooking critical areas.
- Prioritize Critical Needs: Focus on needs that have high importance scores, even if their complexity/cost scores are moderate, as these are likely to be key drivers of success.
- Engage Stakeholders Early: Involve key stakeholders in the process to gain insights and ensure alignment on the identified needs and their importance.
- Be Realistic: When evaluating complexity and costs, be realistic about the organization's capabilities and external factors that may influence these needs.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “What are the most critical capital needs for this innovation opportunity?”
- “How should we prioritize capital needs based on their importance and complexity?”
- “What are the potential challenges in meeting the identified capital needs?”
Example: A company is developing a new AI-powered customer service platform.
-
Human Capital:
- Need: Skilled AI developers and data scientists.
- Importance: 5
- Complexity/Cost: 4
-
Financial Capital:
- Need: Funding for advanced computing infrastructure.
- Importance: 4
- Complexity/Cost: 5
-
Intellectual Capital:
- Need: Development of proprietary algorithms.
- Importance: 5
- Complexity/Cost: 4
-
Social Capital:
- Need: Partnerships with data providers for AI training.
- Importance: 3
- Complexity/Cost: 3
-
Political Capital:
- Need: Navigating regulatory requirements in AI ethics.
- Importance: 4
- Complexity/Cost: 5
-
Reputational Capital:
- Need: Establishing the platform as a trustworthy AI solution.
- Importance: 5
- Complexity/Cost: 4
Capital Needs Scores:
- Human Capital Needs Score: (5 + 4) / 2 = 4.5
- Financial Capital Needs Score: (4 + 5) / 2 = 4.5
- Intellectual Capital Needs Score: (5 + 4) / 2 = 4.5
- Social Capital Needs Score: (3 + 3) / 2 = 3
- Political Capital Needs Score: (4 + 5) / 2 = 4.5
- Reputational Capital Needs Score: (5 + 4) / 2 = 4.5
Total Impact
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
20 mins
Modality
Team
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- Before Super Seven Reviews: Complete this drill prior to your Super Seven Reviews with the Next Boards to provide valuable insights into the state and potential of the innovation opportunity. It equips you with data-driven assessments that can facilitate more productive and targeted discussions.
- After Small Bets: Recalculate your Capital Impact Scores after completing small bets that test super vital assumptions. This helps reassess and realign your focus and resources based on new findings and changes in the forms of capital.
- Ongoing Decision-Making: Use this drill as an ongoing metric for decision-making as your innovation opportunity evolves. It’s especially useful when preparing to pivot, scale, or make other significant changes to the initiative.
Recommended For
- Strategic Alignment: Ensuring that innovation opportunities are aligned with the organization’s broader strategic goals and capital priorities.
- Resource Allocation: Assisting in the prioritization of resources by evaluating the overall impact of an innovation opportunity.
- Risk Management: Identifying and mitigating risks associated with the innovation opportunity by understanding its impact on various forms of capital.
- Decision Making: Providing a clear, quantifiable metric (Capital Impact Score) to guide innovation-related decisions.
Drill Objectives
- To integrate various aspects of capital (risk, contribution, needs) into one unified score.
- To assist in the evaluation of the worthiness of innovation opportunities.
- To provide a holistic view of the innovation opportunity’s impact on the organization’s strategic goals and resources.
Useful Inputs
- Scores and insights from the Worthy or Not Drill, Risky Business Drill, Promises Promises Drill, and Mind the Gap Drill.
- Strategic goals and priorities of the organization.
- Input from key stakeholders and team members.
Outcomes
- A Capital Impact Score for each form of capital.
- An Overall Capital Impact Score for the innovation opportunity.
- An overall understanding of which forms of capital are most impacted by the innovation opportunity.
Gather your scores and insights from the Worthy or Not Drill, Risky Business Drill, Promises Promises Drill, and Mind the Gap Drill.
Use the scores from the Worthy or Not Drill for the weightings.
For each form of capital (Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputation, Social), use the following formula to calculate the Capital Impact Score:
Capital Impact Score = (Capital Contribution − ((Capital Risk + Capital Need) ÷ 2)) × Capital Weight
Total the individual Capital Impact Scores to arrive at an Overall Capital Impact Score.
Use the scores to guide decision-making and planning. Higher scores indicate areas where the innovation opportunity has a significant positive impact, while lower scores may indicate areas requiring more attention or re-evaluation.
Impact Scores
1 = Emerging Impact: Early signs of positive impact; benefits are not yet substantial but hold promise.
2 = Established Impact: Clear, established positive impact; benefits outweigh risks and needs reasonably.
3 = Notable Impact: Significant positive impact; benefits present a favorable balance against risks or needs.
4 = Significant Impact: Substantial positive impact; benefits overshadow risks or needs.
5 = Exceptional Impact: Transformative positive impact; benefits far outweigh risks or needs.
Present the Scores in an Executive-Friendly Manner:
- Score Summary: Provide a concise summary of the Capital Impact Scores for each form of capital, highlighting the most and least favorable aspects.
- Visual Representation: Use charts or graphs to visually represent the scores, making it easier for executives to grasp each innovation opportunity’s overall impact quickly.
- Contextual Explanation: Offer a brief explanation of what each score means in the context of the organization’s goals and the specific innovation opportunity. Relate the scores to potential business outcomes.
Provide Actionable Insights Based on Scores:
- Score Thresholds: Define score thresholds for each stage of the innovation opportunity’s lifecycle. Opportunities that meet or exceed these thresholds are considered strong candidates for further investment and resources.
- Opportunities for Improvement: For opportunities with lower scores, identify specific areas (such as reducing capital risk or increasing capital contribution) where focused efforts might improve the overall score.
- Resource Allocation Recommendations: Based on the scores, provide recommendations for allocating or reallocating resources to maximize the potential impact of each opportunity.
- Risk Mitigation Strategies: For opportunities with high capital risk scores, suggest strategies or contingencies to mitigate these risks.
Incorporating Scores into Portfolio Decision-Making
- Portfolio Fit Analysis: Analyze how each opportunity aligns with the portfolio strategy. Opportunities with high capital impact scores that align with strategic goals might be prioritized.
- Progress Tracking: Use the scores to track the progress of each opportunity over time. Scores that consistently improve can indicate successful execution and alignment with strategic objectives.
- Stop/Go Decisions: Establish clear criteria based on the scores for continuing, pivoting, or stopping the development of each innovation opportunity. Opportunities that fail to meet minimum score thresholds or show declining scores might require reevaluation or discontinuation.
- LFI Loops: Create mechanisms for feedback and learning from each scored opportunity, regardless of its success or failure. This can help refine the scoring process and improve decision-making over time.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “What is the overall capital impact of this innovation opportunity?”
- “How does the Capital Impact Score compare across different forms of capital?”
- “What strategies can we use to improve the Capital Impact Score for this
Example: A tech company is considering a new AI-driven customer service platform.
Scores from Previous Drills:
- Financial Capital: 40%
- Human Capital: 20%
- Intellectual Capital: 25%
- Reputation Capital: 10%
- Social Capital: 5%
- Financial Capital: 4
- Human Capital: 2
- Intellectual Capital: 3
- Reputation Capital: 3
- Social Capital: 2
- Financial Capital: 5
- Human Capital: 4
- Intellectual Capital: 5
- Reputation Capital: 3
- Social Capital: 2
- Financial Capital: 3
- Human Capital: 2
- Intellectual Capital: 3
- Reputation Capital: 4
- Social Capital: 2
- Financial Capital Impact Score: (5 − ((4 + 3) / 2)) × 0.40 = 0.8
- Human Capital Impact Score: (4 − ((2 + 2) / 2)) × 0.20 = 0.8
- Intellectual Capital Impact Score: (5 − ((3 + 3) / 2)) × 0.25 = 1.25
- Reputation Capital Impact Score: (3 − ((3 + 4) / 2)) × 0.10 = (3 − 3.5) × 0.10 = -0.05
- Social Capital Impact Score: (2 − ((2 + 2) / 2)) × 0.05 = 0
- Overall Capital Impact Score: 0.8 + 0.8 + 1.25 + (-0.05) + 0 = 2.8
The Capital Impact score indicates that the innovation opportunity has a moderate impact, particularly on Financial and Intellectual Capital. The negative score in Reputation Capital suggests a potential risk or challenge in that area. The company should consider strategies to mitigate this risk or re-evaluate the opportunity if Reputation Capital is a strategic priority.
Plan B, C, D, and E
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
60 mins
Modality
Team
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- After assessing whether an innovation is worth pursuing through tools like Worthy or Not, Capital Converter, or Risky Business.
- During planning and budgeting phases to evaluate how resources can be flexibly allocated or adjusted.
- When considering how to scale or pivot an innovation based on evolving market or organizational needs.
Recommended For
- Strategic Adaptability: Evaluating how quickly an innovation can scale, shift, or be exited based on organizational goals.
- Risk Management: Ensuring that options to adjust, pause, or exit the innovation are clearly understood.
- Capital Flexibility: Assessing how different forms of capital—human, financial, intellectual, political, reputational, and social—support the innovation opportunity.
Drill Objectives
- To evaluate the Flexibility, Speed, Scalability, and Exit strategies for each form of capital tied to an innovation opportunity.
- To prioritize capital forms based on their potential to adapt and support the innovation under changing conditions.
Outcomes
- A thorough evaluation of an innovation’s option values across six forms of capital.
- A strategic understanding of how an innovation can adapt to changes or scale up and down.
Review outputs from prior tools like Worthy or Not, Capital Converter, Risky Business, Promises Promises, Mind the Gap, and Gives & Gets Solo. Ensure team members understand each form of capital (Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputational, Social) and how it plays into the innovation opportunity.
Step 2: Identify Option Values for Each Form of Capital
For each form of capital, assess the following four option values:
- Flexibility: How easily can the innovation adapt to changing conditions?
- Speed: How quickly can the innovation be executed, scaled, or stopped?
- Scale: Can the innovation be expanded to cover more markets or segments?
- Exit: How feasible is it to discontinue the innovation without significant loss?
Step 3: Generate Examples for Each Option Value
For each option value and form of capital, provide examples that clarify why a certain rating is given. These examples should reflect actual scenarios or potential outcomes.
Step 4: Rate Option Values
Rate each form of capital (Human, Financial, Intellectual, Political, Reputational, Social) against each of the four option values (Flexibility, Speed, Scale, Exit) using a scale of 1 to 5:
1 = Very limited option value
2 = Limited option value
3 = Moderate option value
4 = High option value
5 = Very high option value
Step 5: Calculate Overall Scores
Calculate the average score for each option value (Flexibility, Speed, Scale, Exit) across all forms of capital to understand the overall adaptability and versatility of the innovation.
Step 6: Discuss and Reflect
Review the scores and discuss as a team. Consider how these option values inform the broader strategic direction of the innovation. Discuss any actions needed to improve adaptability in certain areas.
Step 7: Document and Share
Record the option value scores and any insights gained from the discussion. Share the results with key stakeholders, Next Advocates, or board members for feedback.
Step 8: Revisit and Adjust
Revisit the Plan B, C, D, and E evaluation as the innovation progresses. Adjust ratings and plans as the innovation evolves and as new insights are gained.
- Use Past Data: Leverage insights from previous drills to inform the option value ratings. This ensures a more accurate and strategic assessment.
- Engage Stakeholders: Include key stakeholders in the rating and discussion process to get a well-rounded view of the innovation's adaptability.
- Be Realistic: Ratings should reflect actual capacities and constraints, not just ideal scenarios.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “AI, based on the past assessments, what flexibility do we have in leveraging our financial capital for this innovation?”
- “AI, how can we best scale this opportunity across multiple markets given our current intellectual and human capital resources?”
- “AI, what would be the most efficient exit strategy for this opportunity, and how would it impact our political and reputational capital?”
Example: Launching a New Customer Data Analytics Platform
The goal is to evaluate the flexibility, speed, scalability, and exit potential for each form of capital involved in deploying this platform, followed by calculating the Option Value Score for each form of capital and an overall score.
Form of Capital: Human
-
Flexibility Option Value: 4
Example: The team can be reskilled easily as market demands evolve.
-
Speed Option Value: 3
Example: Teams can be quickly onboarded to scale human resources when demand spikes.
-
Scale Option Value: 5
Example: HR programs can be expanded to accommodate a larger workforce with minimal additional resources.
-
Exit Option Value: 2
Example: Shutting down the platform might result in the loss of skilled personnel and disrupt current workflows.
-
Human Capital Option Value Score: (4 + 3 + 5 + 2) / 4 = 3.5
Flexibility Option Value: 2
Example: Initial investment locks significant resources, limiting financial flexibility.
Speed Option Value: 4
Example: Quick financial returns possible through short-term monetization tactics.
Scale Option Value: 3
Example: Expansion requires more funding but is feasible without major setbacks.
Exit Option Value: 3
Example: There is a moderate potential for asset resale, but sunk costs would reduce profitability.
Financial Capital Option Value Score: (2 + 4 + 3 + 3) / 4 = 3.0
Flexibility Option Value: 5
Example: The data analytics algorithms can be adapted for multiple use cases, providing versatility.
Speed Option Value: 4
Example: Fast adaptation of R&D processes to new market trends.
Scale Option Value: 5
Example: The algorithms and intellectual property can be scaled to other industries or expanded for more features.
Exit Option Value: 2
Example: Loss of proprietary knowledge and intellectual property leverage during exit.
Intellectual Capital Option Value Score: (5 + 4 + 5 + 2) / 4 = 4.0
Flexibility Option Value: 3
Example: Political strategy can adapt to different regulatory environments.
Speed Option Value: 2
Example: Approval from regulatory bodies can take time, slowing down potential opportunities.
Scale Option Value: 3
Example: Political relationships and lobbying can expand influence across different regions.
Exit Option Value: 4
Example: Relationships with policymakers can be leveraged in future ventures, even if the current project is exited.
Political Capital Option Value Score: (3 + 2 + 3 + 4) / 4 = 3.0
Form of Capital: Reputational
Flexibility Option Value: 4
Example: A well-regarded brand allows the organization to enter various industries with ease.
Speed Option Value: 3
Example: Swift response to PR challenges to maintain and restore brand reputation.
Scale Option Value: 4
Example: Strong reputation enables the business to expand into new markets easily.
Exit Option Value: 2
Example: Exiting the platform could lead to reputational damage, but existing goodwill could mitigate this.
Reputational Capital Option Value Score: (4 + 3 + 4 + 2) / 4 = 3.25
Form of Capital: Social
Flexibility Option Value: 5
Example: The organization’s broad network can support various collaborations.
Speed Option Value: 4
Example: Quick mobilization of community support for new initiatives.
Scale Option Value: 5
Example: A well-established social network allows for growth through community engagement.
Exit Option Value: 3
Example: Even after exit, relationships can be preserved and transitioned to other opportunities.
Social Capital Option Value Score: (5 + 4 + 5 + 3) / 4 = 4.25
Total Option Value Score Calculation
Human Capital Option Value Score: 3.5
Financial Capital Option Value Score: 3.0
Intellectual Capital Option Value Score: 4.0
Political Capital Option Value Score: 3.0
Reputational Capital Option Value Score: 3.25
Social Capital Option Value Score: 4.25
Overall Option Value Score: (3.5 + 3.0 + 4.0 + 3.0 + 3.25 + 4.25) / 6 = 3.5
Insights
- Strength: Intellectual and Social Capital show the highest flexibility and scalability, suggesting that this innovation opportunity has strong potential in these areas.
- Risk: Exit strategies for Intellectual and Reputational Capital need attention to minimize losses and preserve relationships.
- Overall: The platform demonstrates balanced adaptability and scalability, making it a strong candidate for investment with moderate financial flexibility and speed.
Op-at-a-Glance
Practice
Move Fast
Allocated time
mins
Modality
Rating
unrated (0)
When to use
- Prior to Next Board Meetings.
- Before and after significant Next Cycle Steps.
- During Super Seven Reviews.
- Throughout budgeting and funding allocation phases.
Recommended For
- Strategic Alignment: Ensuring the Innovation Opportunity aligns with serious capital-building priorities.
- Resource Allocation: Making informed decisions about funding and resources based on a holistic understanding of the opportunity.
- Risk Management: Evaluating the risks and potential contributions of the opportunity to various forms of capital.
- Capital Impact Assessment: Assessing how the opportunity impacts human, intellectual, political, reputational, social, and financial capital.
Drill Objectives
- Collate essential information about the Innovation Opportunity.
- Gain insights into the financial and strategic elements of the opportunity.
- Chronicle Super Vital Assumptions (SVAs) and their current statuses.
Useful Inputs
- Outputs from the Port-at-a-Glance Drill.
- Previous reviews of the Innovation Opportunity.
- Present funding distributions and financial metrics.
- Details and roles of the Next Team.
Outcomes
- An in-depth comprehension of the Innovation Opportunity.
- Fiscal guidance for executives, managers, and innovators.
- Documented Super Vital Assumptions and their latest statuses.
- Name of Innovation Opportunity: List the name.
- Opportunity Portfolio: Specify which portfolio it belongs to (Optimize, Grow, Renew, Maximize).
- Current Next Cycle Stage & Step: Identify the stage and step.
- Supported Next Goals: List the goals supported by this opportunity, particularly in relation to serious capital-building.
Step 2. Detail the Next Team.
- Next Team Leader: Specify the leader’s name.
- Next Team Manager: Mention the manager’s name.
- Next Team Executive: Identify the overseeing executive.
- Next Team Members: Enumerate all team members.
- Next Board Members: Mention board members involved.
- Key Next Advocates: Highlight any key advocates within or outside the organization.
Step 3. Record Opportunity Scores.
Record the following Innovation Opportunity Scores (on a scale of 1-5, with 1 being low and 5 being high):
- Most Valuable Form of Capital: Identify the form of capital this opportunity most impacts (e.g., human, intellectual).
- Overall Capital Risk Score: See the Risky Business Drill.
- Overall Capital Contribution Score: See the Promises Promises Drill.
- Overall Capital Need Score: See the Mind the Gap Drill.
- Weighted Capital Impact Score: See Total Impact Drill.
- Overall Option Value Score: See Plan B, C, D, and E Drill.
Step 4. Enter Thresholds.
Thresholds should be set by the Next Board for each Opportunity Portfolio’s Next Stages. Use these to guide innovation opportunity development. Aim to meet or exceed thresholds, or consider stopping development on opportunities that consistently fall below the thresholds.
Record Opportunity Benchmark Funding from the Port-at-a-Glance Drill.
- Record Opportunity Funding Allocation Percentages from the Port-at-a-Glance Drill.
- Calculate Funding Allocations for Each Stage: Multiply the benchmark funding by the respective allocation % for each stage.
- Compute the Opportunity Allocation Share: Divide the funding allocation for each stage by the number of planned opportunities for that stage.
-
Normalize the Weighted Capital Impact Score using the following formula:
Normalized Impact = (Weighted Capital Impact Score ÷ 5) - Determine Discounted Funding for Each Stage: Multiply the funding allocation for each stage by the Normalized Impact.
Step 6. Chronicle Super Vital Assumptions.
- Describe the SVA: Provide a brief overview.
- Identify the SVA Type: For example, Constituent, Pain, Problem, and so on.
- Update SVA Status: Specify if it’s Untested, In Test, True, or False.
Step 7. Catalog Key LFIs from Small Bets. Register significant Learnings From Interactions (LFIs) and evaluate their implications for the Innovation Opportunity.
- Consistent Updates: Regularly update the Op-at-a-Glance to maintain its relevance and accuracy, especially after major developments, reviews, or changes in the Innovation Opportunity.
- Collaboration: Engage cross-functional teams when filling out the drill to gather diverse perspectives. Different departments or roles might offer valuable insights that can be easily overlooked.
- Thresholds as a Guide, Not a Hard Limit: While thresholds set by the Next Board are crucial, they should be seen as guidelines. Exceptional opportunities that slightly fall below a threshold may still be worth pursuing.
- Revisit Funding Percentages: As the Innovation Opportunity matures, its funding needs might change. Periodically reassess the funding allocation percentages to ensure they align with the opportunity's current state and potential.
- Holistic View of Capital: Remember that the value of an Innovation Opportunity isn't just monetary. Consider all forms of capital (e.g., social, human, intellectual) when evaluating its impact and potential.
- Document Assumptions Rigorously: When noting Super Vital Assumptions, be as detailed as possible. The clearer the assumption, the easier it will be to test, validate, or refute.
- Learn from LFIs: Always pay keen attention to Learnings From Interactions (LFIs). They can provide pivotal insights that might influence the direction of the Innovation Opportunity.
- Consider External Factors: While the drill focuses on internal metrics and evaluations, always be aware of the broader market, industry trends, and external influences that could impact the Innovation Opportunity.
- Be Open to Iteration: As more data becomes available, or as the Innovation Opportunity evolves, be prepared to revisit and revise previous decisions or allocations.
- Use the Drill as a Communication Tool: The Op-at-a-Glance can serve as an excellent communication medium between Next Teams, Managers, Executives, and the Next Board. Ensure its contents are clear, concise, and readily accessible to all relevant stakeholders.
- Feedback Loop: After each use, gather feedback on the drill's effectiveness and areas of improvement. Continuous refinement will make the process smoother over time.
- Stay Goal-Oriented: Always relate back to the overarching Next Goals the Innovation Opportunity supports. This alignment ensures that efforts remain focused and in line with broader organizational objectives.
Helpful AI Prompts
- “Summarize the current status of the [Innovation Opportunity Name] using the Op-at-a-Glance Drill.”
- “Identify any gaps in the capital impact scores for [Innovation Opportunity Name].”
- “Recommend adjustments to the funding allocation for [Innovation Opportunity Name] based on its current stage and capital impact.”
- “Evaluate the Super Vital Assumptions for [Innovation Opportunity Name] and suggest areas for further testing.”
Example
Name of Innovation Opportunity: NextGen Energy Storage
Opportunity Portfolio: Grow Portfolio
Current Next Cycle Stage & Step: Incubate, Step 3
Supported Next Goals: Develop sustainable energy solutions that enhance reputational and financial capital.
Next Team
- Next Team Leader: Sarah Johnson
- Next Team Manager: Robert Lee
- Next Team Executive: Maria Sanchez
- Next Team Members: Emily Wong, David Chen, Kevin Patel
- Next Board Members: Mark Daniels, Jane Roberts
- Key Next Advocates: External Partner from CleanTech Alliance
Opportunity Scores
- Most Valuable Form of Capital: Intellectual Capital
- Overall Capital Risk Score: 3
- Overall Capital Contribution Score: 4
- Overall Capital Need Score: 3
- Weighted Capital Impact Score: 2.5
- Overall Option Value Score: 4
- Step 4: Enter Thresholds
Thresholds
- Incubate Stage: Minimum Capital Impact Score of 3 required to proceed.
Opportunity Benchmark Funding: $2 million
Opportunity Funding Allocation Percentages:
- Incubate Stage: 25%
- Accelerate Stage: 30%
-
Funding Allocations for Each Stage:
- Incubate Stage: $2 million x 25% = $500,000
- Incubate Stage: $500,000 / 6 opportunities = $83,333 per opportunity
-
Normalize the Weighted Capital Impact Score:
- Normalized Impact: 2.5 / 5 = 0.5
-
Discounted Funding for Each Stage:
- Incubate Stage: $83,333 x 0.5 = $41,666
Super Vital Assumptions
- SVA Description: Market adoption rates for the new storage technology.
- SVA Type: Problem Hypothesis
- SVA Status: In Test
Key LFIs from Small Bets
- LFI 1: Early feedback from pilot projects indicates strong interest in the new technology, but concerns about cost-effectiveness remain.
Glossary of Terms
- Next Annual Operating Budget: Financial plan for the upcoming fiscal year’s operational costs for innovation opportunities.
- Annual Next Fund: Fund allocated for innovation projects in the upcoming year.
- Next Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs): Number of full-time staff dedicated to innovation.
- Next FTE Days per Year: Average workdays per year dedicated to innovation.
- Next Fund Reserve: Contingency fund set aside for unforeseen opportunities.
- Next Portfolio Allocations: Allocation of innovation resources to each Opportunity Portfolio.
- Next Opportunities at Year Start: Number of ongoing opportunities at the start of the fiscal year.
- # of Next Opportunities in Formulate, Incubate, Accelerate, Operate: Number of opportunities at each stage of the Next Cycle.
- Next Opportunity/Solution Attrition Rates: Projected percentage of opportunities not expected to progress to the next stage.
- Next Opportunity Velocity: Anticipated duration for each stage in the Next Cycle.
- Next Opportunity Burn Rate: Average cost per opportunity at each stage.
- Planned # of New Next Opportunities: Number of new innovation opportunities to be initiated in the upcoming period.